Case Background

A multinational manufacturer plans to establish a long-term partnership with a Shenzhen-based supplier and has commissioned us to conduct an on-site verification of their actual business operations prior to signing the contract.

Key Risk Points

• •Is the registered address consistent with the actual business address?
• •Does production capacity match the claimed output?
• •Is it a shell company or engaged in fake operations?

Verification process

Address Verification → On-site Inspection → Personnel Interviews → Evidence Preservation

On-site discovered

• •Registered address is a defunct office building (false)
• •Actual production capacity is only 1/3 of what was claimed; equipment is outdated.

Final Conclusion

Supplier information is severely false; lacks capacity to handle large orders.

Case Background

A major international brand faces a surge of counterfeit products and has commissioned a traceability investigation and evidence preservation.

Key Risk Points

• •Source of Infringing Production / Sales Channels
• •Infringement Scale / Amount Involved
• •Legal validity of the chain of evidence

Verification process

Market assessment → Channel tracking → On-site evidence collection → Evidence organization

On-site discovered

• •Locked down Underground Factory at 2, producing 5000 units daily.
• •Sales span 12 provinces, involving over ¥300 in value.

Final Conclusion

Lock down the source of infringement and sales networks to build a complete chain of evidence.